10/05/2005
EU to debate Working Time Directive
The European Parliament is beginning a debate of the Working Time Directive today.
The directive, which limits the working week in the EU to 48 hours on average, is being debated as part of a ten-year review following its introduction in 1993.
Britain is widely expected to lobby in favour of the retention of an opt-out clause, which allows workers to choose to work more than 48 hours if they wish to do so.
The UK is the only EU country that allows all workers to sign away their right to work no more than 48 hours per work, which the Trades Union Congress (TUC) says is “regularly abused”.
The European Parliament will debate proposals drawn up by Spanish MEP Alejandro Cercas Alonso including: the phasing out of the individual opt-out over three years; counting time spent ‘on call’ at work; and giving employers the right to have requests to vary their hours considered seriously by employers.
The Parliament will also debate a proposal to all the working week to be averaged over a year, rather than the current 17 weeks, which would still allow people to work more than 48 hours, as long as their average working week was less than 48 hours. There is also a proposal to introduce safeguards to ensure the health and safety of workers and the public are not put at risk.
TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: “This issue has been deadlocked for too long. The European Parliament should accept this sensible compromise. It certainly does not go as far as we would like, but it does meet the key objection from most employers who encourage their staff to sign an opt-out.
“Employers say that they need the flexibility to be able to cope with the peaks and troughs of workload. An annual average does precisely this. If they are forcing staff to work more than 48 hours week in week out, then there is something very wrong with that workplace and a real risk to the long-term health of the workforce. That is not flexibility, but severe overwork and appalling productivity.”
Mr Barber said that the end of the opt-out clause would help to tackle the problems of the long working hours culture in Britain.
However, the UK Engineering Employer’s Federation (EEF) described the amendments as “damaging” and said that they would remove a “vital component of the flexibility of the UK labour market”.
EEF Deputy Director of Employment Policy, David Yeandle said: “We would urge all UK MEPs to reject these damaging amendments to the Commission's proposal that would remove the individual opt out and undermine the UK’s labour market flexibility. The government must continue to stand firm and eyeball to eyeball with Brussels on this important issue.”
(KMcA/SP)
The directive, which limits the working week in the EU to 48 hours on average, is being debated as part of a ten-year review following its introduction in 1993.
Britain is widely expected to lobby in favour of the retention of an opt-out clause, which allows workers to choose to work more than 48 hours if they wish to do so.
The UK is the only EU country that allows all workers to sign away their right to work no more than 48 hours per work, which the Trades Union Congress (TUC) says is “regularly abused”.
The European Parliament will debate proposals drawn up by Spanish MEP Alejandro Cercas Alonso including: the phasing out of the individual opt-out over three years; counting time spent ‘on call’ at work; and giving employers the right to have requests to vary their hours considered seriously by employers.
The Parliament will also debate a proposal to all the working week to be averaged over a year, rather than the current 17 weeks, which would still allow people to work more than 48 hours, as long as their average working week was less than 48 hours. There is also a proposal to introduce safeguards to ensure the health and safety of workers and the public are not put at risk.
TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: “This issue has been deadlocked for too long. The European Parliament should accept this sensible compromise. It certainly does not go as far as we would like, but it does meet the key objection from most employers who encourage their staff to sign an opt-out.
“Employers say that they need the flexibility to be able to cope with the peaks and troughs of workload. An annual average does precisely this. If they are forcing staff to work more than 48 hours week in week out, then there is something very wrong with that workplace and a real risk to the long-term health of the workforce. That is not flexibility, but severe overwork and appalling productivity.”
Mr Barber said that the end of the opt-out clause would help to tackle the problems of the long working hours culture in Britain.
However, the UK Engineering Employer’s Federation (EEF) described the amendments as “damaging” and said that they would remove a “vital component of the flexibility of the UK labour market”.
EEF Deputy Director of Employment Policy, David Yeandle said: “We would urge all UK MEPs to reject these damaging amendments to the Commission's proposal that would remove the individual opt out and undermine the UK’s labour market flexibility. The government must continue to stand firm and eyeball to eyeball with Brussels on this important issue.”
(KMcA/SP)
Related Northern Ireland Recruitment News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
25 July 2003
Government extends protection for NI workers
New measures to protect around 15,000 additional workers from excessive hours and unreasonable working patterns have been introduced by the Department of Employment and Learning (DEL).
Government extends protection for NI workers
New measures to protect around 15,000 additional workers from excessive hours and unreasonable working patterns have been introduced by the Department of Employment and Learning (DEL).
07 November 2006
TUC Say 48-hour Opt Out Unnecessary
As European ministers meet to discuss the future of the UK's opt-out from the Working Time Directive's 48 hour limit on the average working week, the TUC has claimed that the UK 'does not need an opt-out' any longer.
TUC Say 48-hour Opt Out Unnecessary
As European ministers meet to discuss the future of the UK's opt-out from the Working Time Directive's 48 hour limit on the average working week, the TUC has claimed that the UK 'does not need an opt-out' any longer.
08 February 2011
Belfast College To Loose 200 Staff
Belfast Metropolitan College has confirmed it is likely to shed more than 200 jobs in restructuring plans. The college has finished a 90-day consultation period with unions about the plans - although it also admitted that talks had "broken down". A statement issued on Tuesday said 120 full-time and 93 part time positions are under threat.
Belfast College To Loose 200 Staff
Belfast Metropolitan College has confirmed it is likely to shed more than 200 jobs in restructuring plans. The college has finished a 90-day consultation period with unions about the plans - although it also admitted that talks had "broken down". A statement issued on Tuesday said 120 full-time and 93 part time positions are under threat.
11 February 2004
Move to end workers' long hours slammed by CBI
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has strongly criticised the European Parliament today after MEPs voted to stop employees working more than 48 hours a week.
Move to end workers' long hours slammed by CBI
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has strongly criticised the European Parliament today after MEPs voted to stop employees working more than 48 hours a week.
11 March 2009
Toyota To Cut Pay And Working Hours
Carmaker Toyota has announced it is to cut working hours by 10% at two UK factories. The cutbacks, which will also affect pay for the workers at its factories in Burnaston near Derby and Deeside in north Wales, will start next month and last up to one year.
Toyota To Cut Pay And Working Hours
Carmaker Toyota has announced it is to cut working hours by 10% at two UK factories. The cutbacks, which will also affect pay for the workers at its factories in Burnaston near Derby and Deeside in north Wales, will start next month and last up to one year.