06/08/2009
Accolade For 'Voluntary' Nursing Homes
On average, not-for-profit nursing homes deliver higher quality care than for-profit nursing homes.
This is one of the findings in a new study published this week on the British Medical Journal's website, bmj.com.
However, the authors stress that many factors may influence this relation and more work is needed to explore the impact of profit status on the quality of care delivered.
Concerns about quality of care in nursing home care are widespread.
In the United States, two thirds of nursing homes are for-profit institutions, while in Canada, just over half of nursing homes are in for-profit ownership.
Similarly, in the UK, more than half of healthcare beds belong to independent nursing homes for older people, most of which are operated by for-profit institutions.
So a team of researchers based in Canada analysed the results of 82 studies, spanning 1965 to 2003, comparing quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes. Most of the studies were carried out in the US and Canada.
Differences in study design and quality were taken into account to minimise bias.
Forty studies showed significantly better quality in not-for-profit homes, while three studies favoured quality of care in for-profit homes.
The remaining studies had mixed results suggesting that, although the average effect is clear, there is substantial variation across institutions.
Further analysis suggested that not-for-profit facilities delivered higher quality care than did for-profit facilities for two of the four most frequently used quality measures: more or higher quality staffing and lower pressure ulcer prevalence.
The analysis also favoured not-for-profit homes in the other two measures: use of physical restraint and lower regulatory agency deficiencies. But these results were not statistically significant.
Based on these findings, the authors estimate that nursing home residents in Canada would receive roughly 42,000 more hours of nursing care per day and those in the United States would receive 500,000 more hours of nursing care per day if not-for-profit institutions provided all nursing home care.
Similarly, they estimate that 600 of 7,000 residents with pressure ulcers in Canada, and 7,000 of 80,000 residents with pressure ulcers in the United States are attributable to for-profit ownership.
These findings provide insight into average effects and suggest a trend towards higher quality care in not-for-profit facilities than for-profit homes, write the authors.
Professor Tamara Konetzka from the University of Chicago in an accompanying editorial, pointed out that more data is needed to increase understanding of the association between profit status and the quality of nursing homes.
But she points out that many factors other than profit status have been strongly linked to the quality of nursing home care, and warned that: "If differences in quality between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes stem at least in part from differences in revenues rather than mission, eliminating for-profit homes may do little to eliminate differences in quality."
(BMcC/KMcA)
This is one of the findings in a new study published this week on the British Medical Journal's website, bmj.com.
However, the authors stress that many factors may influence this relation and more work is needed to explore the impact of profit status on the quality of care delivered.
Concerns about quality of care in nursing home care are widespread.
In the United States, two thirds of nursing homes are for-profit institutions, while in Canada, just over half of nursing homes are in for-profit ownership.
Similarly, in the UK, more than half of healthcare beds belong to independent nursing homes for older people, most of which are operated by for-profit institutions.
So a team of researchers based in Canada analysed the results of 82 studies, spanning 1965 to 2003, comparing quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes. Most of the studies were carried out in the US and Canada.
Differences in study design and quality were taken into account to minimise bias.
Forty studies showed significantly better quality in not-for-profit homes, while three studies favoured quality of care in for-profit homes.
The remaining studies had mixed results suggesting that, although the average effect is clear, there is substantial variation across institutions.
Further analysis suggested that not-for-profit facilities delivered higher quality care than did for-profit facilities for two of the four most frequently used quality measures: more or higher quality staffing and lower pressure ulcer prevalence.
The analysis also favoured not-for-profit homes in the other two measures: use of physical restraint and lower regulatory agency deficiencies. But these results were not statistically significant.
Based on these findings, the authors estimate that nursing home residents in Canada would receive roughly 42,000 more hours of nursing care per day and those in the United States would receive 500,000 more hours of nursing care per day if not-for-profit institutions provided all nursing home care.
Similarly, they estimate that 600 of 7,000 residents with pressure ulcers in Canada, and 7,000 of 80,000 residents with pressure ulcers in the United States are attributable to for-profit ownership.
These findings provide insight into average effects and suggest a trend towards higher quality care in not-for-profit facilities than for-profit homes, write the authors.
Professor Tamara Konetzka from the University of Chicago in an accompanying editorial, pointed out that more data is needed to increase understanding of the association between profit status and the quality of nursing homes.
But she points out that many factors other than profit status have been strongly linked to the quality of nursing home care, and warned that: "If differences in quality between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes stem at least in part from differences in revenues rather than mission, eliminating for-profit homes may do little to eliminate differences in quality."
(BMcC/KMcA)
Related UK National News Stories
Click here for the latest headlines.
30 January 2015
More Than 350 Councils To Receive New Homes Bonus Payments
Housing Minister, Brandon Lewis, has published the final allocations of New Homes Bonus Payments to over 350 councils in England. The total awarded to councils since the scheme's introduction is£3.4 billion, for delivering more than 700,000 new homes and conversions, and bringing over 100,000 empty homes back into use.
More Than 350 Councils To Receive New Homes Bonus Payments
Housing Minister, Brandon Lewis, has published the final allocations of New Homes Bonus Payments to over 350 councils in England. The total awarded to councils since the scheme's introduction is£3.4 billion, for delivering more than 700,000 new homes and conversions, and bringing over 100,000 empty homes back into use.
10 December 2014
CQC Shut Down Nursing Home After Inspectors Report Unsafe Care
A Surrey nursing home has been shut down after Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspectors warned the elderly residents were at "significant risk of harm". The CQC said a recent inspection of Merok Park Nursing Home in Banstead found the nursing home to be "dirty", with an "overpowering" smell of urine.
CQC Shut Down Nursing Home After Inspectors Report Unsafe Care
A Surrey nursing home has been shut down after Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspectors warned the elderly residents were at "significant risk of harm". The CQC said a recent inspection of Merok Park Nursing Home in Banstead found the nursing home to be "dirty", with an "overpowering" smell of urine.
26 February 2013
Less Than Half Of People In Care Homes Enjoy A Good Quality Of Life
Eighty per cent of people living in care homes have either dementia or severe memory problems according to a new Alzheimer's Society report published today. However, while excellent care exists, less than half of these 322,000 people are enjoying a good quality of life.
Less Than Half Of People In Care Homes Enjoy A Good Quality Of Life
Eighty per cent of people living in care homes have either dementia or severe memory problems according to a new Alzheimer's Society report published today. However, while excellent care exists, less than half of these 322,000 people are enjoying a good quality of life.
07 February 2006
Care homes failing on medication standards
Nearly half of all nursing and care homes in England are failing to meet national minimum standards on medication, an inspectors report has claimed. People are often given the wrong medication, someone else's medication, medication in the wrong doses or no medication at all, the Commission for Social Care Inspection report found.
Care homes failing on medication standards
Nearly half of all nursing and care homes in England are failing to meet national minimum standards on medication, an inspectors report has claimed. People are often given the wrong medication, someone else's medication, medication in the wrong doses or no medication at all, the Commission for Social Care Inspection report found.
30 March 2009
Regulation For Health And Adult Social Care Providers Published
A new framework to regulate the safety and quality of health and social care services was published today by the Department of Health, ahead of the new Care Quality Commission coming into effect on 1 April 2009.
Regulation For Health And Adult Social Care Providers Published
A new framework to regulate the safety and quality of health and social care services was published today by the Department of Health, ahead of the new Care Quality Commission coming into effect on 1 April 2009.
-
Northern Ireland WeatherToday:A showery start with outbreaks most frequent north of Lough Neagh and through the morning, before dwindling during the afternoon as the northwest breezes ease and brighter spells of weak sunshine prosper. Maximum temperature 8 °C.Tonight:A dry night, save for a few light showers around the coasts, with prolonged clear spells and light winds bringing a frosty dawn for many in central and southern parts. Minimum temperature -3 °C.